Many algorithms have been developed and published in the last forty years from ireys algorithm1972, karch and lasangas method 1977, to the who causality scale and the naranjo scale more recently. Pdf causality assessment of adverse drug reactions. Evaluation of naranjo adverse drug reactions probability. Thehorns drug interaction probability scale dips consists of 10 questions each with three response options to which a score is assigned 37. This scale was developed to help standardize assessment of causality for. Causality assessment of suspected adverse drug reactions 1. The use of the whoumc system for standardised case. Comparison of agreement and rational uses of the who and. Validation of a modified naranjo scale for causality. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug.
Center for drug evaluation and research food and drug. Adverse drug reactions due to cancer chemotherapy in a. Naranjo algorithm adr probability scale the naranjo algorithm, or adversedrug reaction probability scale, is a method by which to assess whether there is a causalrelationship between an identified untoward clinical event and a drug using a simple questionnaire to assign probability scores. These scales represent convenient, practical tools for assessing the probability that a given reaction can be. Examples of causality algorithms naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale world health organization, the uppsala monitoring centre whoumc causality assessment system causality outcomes naranjo adr probability scale to assess the adverse. Like the naranjo scale, it has broad utility and would be useful for assessing the causality of adverse events. Six testing and 22 wk retesting later the same observers independently reanalyzed the 63 cases by assigning a weighted score adr probability scale to each of the components that must be considered in establishing causal associations between drugs and adverse events e. The naranjo adr probability scale was developed to help standardize assessment of causality for all adverse drug reactions. Results during the study period, a total of 304 patients were monitored, of which 160 adrs were observed in 98 patients accounting 32. The causality assessment of the reported adrs was done using the naranjo causality assessment scale into definite, probable, or possible or. Conclusion the naranjo scale lacks validity and reproducibility in the attribution of causality in hepatotoxicity. These causality assessment scales will be displayed and discussed during this poster presentation. Are the naranjo criteria reliable and valid for determination.
Aim to compare the naranjo method with the standard liverspeci. Drugs are evaluated individually for causality, and points deducted if another factor may have resulted in the adverse event, thereby weakening the causal association. This scale was developed to help standardize assessment of causality for all adverse drug reactions and was not designed specifically for drug induced liver injury. Causality assessment of adverse drug reaction in pulmonology department of a tertiary care hospital abstract background. Causality assessment to assess the adverse drug reaction. For the assessment of causality between drug and suspected adr, various causality assessment scales been used. Naranjo scale, kramers algorithm, karsh and lasagna scale and whoumc causality assessment criteria but the two most widely used are the whoumc and naranjo probability scale. Annexure 12 naranjo adverse drug reaction probability. The adverse drug reaction adr probability scale was developed in 1991 by naranjo and coworkers from the university of toronto and is often referred to as the naranjo scale. The commonly used naranjo scale ns for causality assessment has several limitations and tends to rule in favor of a positive causal effect even when adverse events are unrelated to the drug. The monarcsi scores and associated standard deviations are used in a fitted logistic equation eq.
Our analysis found 278 cases of acute pancreatitis reported to the fda between february 2010 and december 2011 in which liraglutide was listed as the primary suspect drug. Sample modified naranjo causality scale for icsrs monarcsi probability or confidence level for a causal relationship between the drug and adverse event for a drugevent pair. The current standard liverspecific council for international organizations of medical sciencesroussel uclaf causality assessment method scale is complex and difficult to implement. Background causality assessment in hepatotoxicity is challenging. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Causality assessment of adverse drug reaction in pulmonology. A similar scenario can be expected where an ae scores 14 on the naranjo scale and, hence, is labeled as possibly caused by the particular drug. Naranjo algoritm systematic causality assessment 10 questions sumscore 63 cases from the literature only 3 authors.
The causality assessment system proposed by the world health organization collaborating centre for international drug monitoring, the uppsala monitoring centre whoumc, and the naranjo probability scale are the generally accepted and most widely used methods for causality assessment in clinical practice as they offer a simple methodology. Adverse drug reaction probability scale naranjo in drug. Nov 11, 2015 naranjo algorithm adr probability scale the naranjo algorithm, or adversedrug reaction probability scale, is a method by which to assess whether there is a causalrelationship between an identified untoward clinical event and a drug using a simple questionnaire to assign probability scores. The naranjo adverse drug reactions probability scale had low sen.
An expert panel is required for the drug induced liver injury net. Adverse drug reaction and causality assessment scales. Roussel uclaf causality assessment method scale in evaluating the accuracy and. Whoumc causality categories causality term assessment criteria certain event or laboratory test abnormality, with plausible time relationship to drug intake cannot be explained by disease or other drugs. An example of one of the more commonly used algorithms. Are there previous conclusive reports on this reaction. Objectives to evaluate agreement between causality assessments of reported adverse drug reactions adrs obtained from decisional algorithms, with those obtained from an expert panel using the who global introspection method gi, according to different levels of imputability and to evaluate the influence of confounding variables. Director of pharmacy services glendale adventist medical center, glendale, ca learning objectives methodologies in capturing suspected adrs implement a system in assessing adrs pharmacists role in assessing adrs reporting findings introduction all drugs are dangerous fda drug safety. Are the naranjo criteria reliable and valid for determination of adverse drug reactions in the intensive care unit. Manjunath nookala krishnamurthy, jyothi sharma and vikram gota.
For both methods, the interrater multirater reliability ratings determined using iccs and fleiss. Whoumc causality categories causality term assessment criteria certain event or laboratory test abnormality, with plausible time relationship to drug intake. Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale worksheet pdf 100 kb the naranjo algorithm, or adverse drug reaction probability scale, is a method by which to assess whether there is a causal relationship between an identified untoward clinical event and a drug using a simple questionnaire to assign probability scores. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions 1. Development and validation of a modified naranjo scale for. Methods for estimating causal relationships of adverse. Method criteria probability scale naranjo s algorithm previous report of the same reaction temporal relationship. Pdf modified naranjo causality scale for icsrs monarcsi. Most commonly used causality assessment scales are naranjo adr probability scale and who. Using the naranjo causality scale romic eskandarian, pharm. Causality assessment is the method by which the extent of relationship between a drug and a suspected reaction is established, i. Hence, even if all the criteria as per the who are not fulfilled, the causality can be labeled as probable if there are favorable responses to other criteria.
Adverse drug reaction and causality assessment scales medind. The causality assessment of the reported adrs was done using the naranjo causality assessment scale into definite, probable, or possible or doubtful 8. Certain a clinical event, including a laboratory test abnormality, that occurs in a plausible time relation to drug coun 100% chi administration, and which cannot be explained by. Eskandarian tr 2 effectively using the naranjo scale. Clinical analysis of adverse drug reactions in principles of clinical. Study on the classification, causality, preventability and. The use of the whoumc system for standardised case causality.
Feb 14, 2017 4 causality assessment of vaccine related adverse events vaccines are administered on large scale to healthy individuals, children, infants and neonates. A number of algorithms or decision aids have been published including the jones algorithm, 11 the naranjo algorithm, 9 the yale algorithm, 12 the karch algorithm, the begaud algorithm, 14 the adrac, 15 the whoumc 16 and a newer quantitative approach algorithm. The naranjo criteria do not take into account drugdrug interactions. The scale was also designed for use in controlled trials and registration studies of new medications, rather than in routine clinical practice. Modified naranjo causality scale for an individual case safety report monarcsi is a tool that assists safety professionals performing causality assessments. Method developed by the advisory committee on causality assessment acca in canada. Recent studies have questioned the use of naranjos algorithm and compared new instruments against the superseded naranjo scale. Roussel uclaf causality assessment method scale 72%, j w. Probability is assigned via a score termed definite, probable, possible or doubtful. The causality assessment of dili began more as an art form than a science,7 although the use of early methodologies involving nonorganspecific drug reactions, such as the naranjo scale, are now considered inadequate for determining liverspecific damage. A study of agreement between the naranjo algorithm and whoumc criteria for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions mahesh n belhekar, santosh r taur, renuka p munshi department of clinical pharmacology, topiwala national medical college and bai yamunabai laxmanrao nair charitable hospital, mumbai central, mumbai, maharashtra, india. Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale worksheet pdf 100 kb.
Madrac and naranjo s algorithm in causality assessment was 15. Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale evidencio. Scale, while there was a higher agreement when using the council for international organizations of medical sciences. The scale was also designed for use in controlled trials. The naranjo adverse drug reactions probability scale had low sensitivity 54% and poor negative predictive value 29% and showed a limited capability to distinguish between adjacent categories of probability.
Scale reaction was done by who probability scale w. Adverse drug reaction adr is considered to be the sixth leading cause of death. Anyone who has had the opportunity to use an algorithm of 30 questions or above would appreciate the thought. Similar to other clinical event monitor studies, computer alert signals with a score of. The monarcsi scores and associated standard deviations are used in. Pdf adverse drug reaction and causality assessment scales. Causality assessment in individual case reports richard hill uppsala, may, 2011. Backgroundthe naranjo criteria are frequently used for determination of causality for suspected adverse drug reactions adrs.
The adverse drug reaction adr probability scale was developed. We have therefore attempted to modify the existing ns for better causality assessment. Modified naranjo causality scale for icsrs monarcsi. The incidence rate estimates approximately 2% of hospital admissions are due to adrs. Causality assessment aide memoire naranjo adr probability scale 2 questions answers yes no not known 1. As a component of the adopted standard operating procedures of the portuguese pharmacovigilance system, the global introspection gi based on the world health organisation scale of imputability2 has been used. These algorithms ranged from 8 questions to 72 questions. Method two hundred reports were included in this study.
Causality and severity assessment the adrs were analyzed for causality assessment with the naranjo scale which showed. I the naranjo scale or naranjo algorithm is a questionnaire designed by naranjo et al. Recent studies have questioned the use of naranjo s algorithm and compared new instruments against the superseded naranjo scale. Algorithms for assessing the probability of an adverse. Adverse drug reaction probability scale naranjo in drug induced. Several diagnostic assessment tools have been proposed to evaluate and manage adverse drug reactions and. Annexure 12 naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale.
A study of agreement between the naranjo algorithm and who. Causality assessment of suspected adverse drug reaction. The use of the whoumc system for standardised case causality assessment 2 table 2. Modified naranjo causality scale for an individual case safety report monarcsi is a tool that assists safety professionals performing causality assessments between an identified untoward. Causality assessment of suspected adverse drug reaction with.
826 993 1318 516 365 1360 647 1555 1455 627 990 1007 640 137 1401 1619 730 585 1452 330 839 801 311 322 855 959 547 497 36 1404 612 257 1250 597 1235 1128 1344 734 843 1078 1410 707 1141 437 944